Quantcast The Daily Pennsylvanian
DailyPennsylvanian.com
The Daily Pennsylvanian is the University of Pennsylvania's Independent Student Newspaper
Issue date: 2/21/07 Section: News

Ex-prof pleads guilty

Ward could get 15-30 years in prison after guilty plea in child-porn case

Clint Cohen

  • Print
  • Email
Former Wharton professor Scott Ward pled guilty in federal court yesterday to producing child pornography for importation into the United States.

Ward, who has been held in custody since August, is scheduled for sentencing May 11.

His trial was expected to begin in Alexandria, Va., next Monday.

Ward's charge carries a sentence of 15 to 30 years in prison, according to a press release issued by the U.S. District Attorney's Office in Virginia.

"Our children are at risk from predators not just in our state or in our country, but around the world," U.S. Attorney Chuck Rosenberg said in the press release. "This is a disturbing crime, and it is without borders."

Ward's lawyers did not return repeated calls for comment.

Philadelphia criminal attorney Patrick Artur, who is not involved in the case, said that Ward likely pled guilty because of the overwhelming evidence in the prosecution's favor.

Police reports indicate that, prior to Ward's arrest, customs officials had grown suspicious of his frequent trips to Thailand, a known destination for child-predator sex tourists.

When Ward - who had faced previous charges of sexual misconduct - arrived at Dulles International Airport on Aug. 27 from a trip to Brazil, a routine search revealed child pornography on his computer. Further examination turned up a digital camcorder and accompanying mini-DVDs that showed Ward engaged in sexual acts with an underaged boy.

"The facts seemed to be against him," he said.

Even if the defense had pushed forward with a not-guilty plea, Artur added, there would be little evidence to sustain Ward's case.

If the case had gone to trial, the defense might have attempted to prove the search of Ward's luggage by customs officials unlawful. But because those officials are not subject to normal search requirements, "search-and-seizure issues are out the window," Artur said.

Alternatively, he said, the defense might have argued that the other person in Ward's videos was not a child at all.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1

Student

posted 2/21/07 @ 12:14 PM EST

For those that are interested in this sad case, philadelphia magazine published a huge spread on this, revealing all of the horrific details...most of which was never mentioned by the university. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.


Advertisement

Register for the e-mail edition.
Popular Stories
News Tip
Latest Interactive
See a timeline of Penn's conflicts of interests over the past year.
see more interactives


Advertisement